Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Item Bias in Individually Administered Ability Tests: Implications for Nondiscriminatory Assessment

Anne M. Murray

Tucson Unified School District

Shitala P. Mishra

University of Arizona

The study reviewed recent research investigating test-item bias in frequently used individually administered ability tests. An examination of relevant literature suggested that only a limited number of studies in recent years have examined the item-bias issue involving the use of individually administered ability tests. Six methodologies for identifying biased items are presented: (1) measures of item difficulty, (2) analysis of variance procedures, (3) item response theory, (4) chi-square procedures, (5) log-linear models, and (6) judgmental analysis. Implications of the research for assessment practice are examined.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 1, No. 4, 353-366 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/073428298300100405


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?