Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banerji, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Integrated Study of the Predictive Properties of the Gesell School Readiness Screening Test

Madhabi Banerji

Pasco County Scool District, Land O' Lakes, Florida

The predictive properties of the Gesell School Readiness Screening Test, which measures developmental age (DA), were examined in two independent subject samples. Analyses examined the correlational properties of DA with first-grade achievement, incremental validity of DA over chronological age, effects on long-term achievement of 2-year and 1 -year kindergarten programs for students who start school with low DAs, and accuracy of classification by DA. Modest positive correlations were found between DA and achievement (.29 -. 39); DA showed a significant increment in prediction over chronological age. Correlations were not sufficient to enable accurate classification of mature and immature students. Students with low DAs were found to be misclassified most frequently. Inadequate support was found for the 2-year treatment of students who start school with initially low DAs.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 10, No. 3, 240-256 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299201000304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?