Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birenbaum, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gutvirtz, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Relationship Between Test Anxiety and Seriousness of Errors in Algebra

Menucha Birenbaum

Tel-Aviv University, Israel

Yaffa Gutvirtz

Ironi-Daled High School, Tel-Aviv

The purpose of the study was to discern via an error analysis the process that underlies the relationship between test anxiety (TA) and mathematics test performance, with gender as a mediator variable. Sarason's RTT questionnaire (as a measure of TA) and a diagnostic test in algebra were administered to 231 junior high school students. Error analysis of the algebra test yielded 35 mal-rules, which were classified into two categories of serious and nonserious errors. The main findings were: (a) TA was related significantly to serious errors and to the total test score, but not to non-serious errors; (b) Students in the low achievement group reported higher levels of TA and committed far more serious errors than students in the high achievement grouping; and (c) The above findings were more pronounced for girls than for boys, yet girls did not differ from boys with respect to achievement grouping and to the measures of test performance. However, girls outscored boys in the emotional component of TA.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 11, No. 1, 12-19 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299301100102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?