Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Devers, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Severe Discrepancy Determination for Retained and Nonretained Students: Ageor Grade-Based Achievement Standard Scores?

Larry D. Evans

Robert J. Devers

Arkansas Children's Hospital and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

This study investigated the differences between exclusive use of age-based and grade-based achievement scores on mean achievement, IQ-achievement discrepancies, and severe discrepancy rates for retained and nonretained students. The sample included 225 nonretained and 142 retained students referred to a Child Development Center for psychoeducational assessment. Each was administered an intelligence test and achievement measure that provided age and grade scores. Compared to use of age-based scores, grade-based scores for retained students resulted in higher mean achievement scores, smaller discrepancy sizes, and lower severe discrepancy rates. For nonretained students, use of age scores resulted in higher mean achievement scores, smaller discrepancy sizes, and lower discrepany rates. Issues that guided score selection are discussed.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 11, No. 1, 20-28 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299301100103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?