Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, N. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparison of Hospitalized Depressed Patients and Matched Normal Controls on Tests that Differ in their Level of Cognitive Complexity

Alan S. Kaufman

University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama

Ira Grossman

Mesa Vista Hospital, San Diego, California

Nadeen L. Kaufman

Mesa Vista Hospital, San Diego, California

Some research results have suggested that depressed patients perform better on effortless tasks than they do on tasks that require sustained effort. Some of those investigations employed questionable measures or poor control groups. In this investigation, the cognitive performance of 56 hospitalized adolescent and adult inpatients diagnosed with clinical depression was compared to the performance of a matched control group of normal individuals. The samples were compared on reliable and valid tasks that differ in their level of cognitive complexity, using Luria's theory as a basis of categorization. Luria's Block 1 functions of attention-orientation, assessed by a test of Mental Status, represented a level of low cognitive complexity. Luria's Block 2 functions of successive and simultaneous processes, assessed by tests of Number Recall and Gestalt Closure, represented a level of medium cognitive complexity. Luria's Block 3 functions of high-level planning ability, assessed by a test called Four-Letter Words, represented a level of high cognitive complexity. The normal and depressed samples did not differ significantly on any of the tasks, which suggests that they perform as well on effortful tasks as on effortless tasks.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 12, No. 2, 112-125 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299401200201
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?