This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Flanagan, D. P. Articles by Alfonso, V. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Critical Review of the Technical Characteristics of New and Recently Revised Intelligence Tests for Preschool Children

St. John's University

Vincent C. Alfonso

Fordham University and Crossroads School for Child Development

This paper examined the psychometric properties of intelligence tests for preschoolers, including standardization, reliability, test floors, item gradients, and validity. The WPPSI-R, DAS, S-B:IV, WJ-R COG, and BSID-IL were reviewed. The psychometric properties of these instruments are weakest at the lower end of the preschool age range (i.e., 2-6 to 3-6), a finding that is consistent with previous research. The WJ-R COG and BSID-II are among the better instruments for use with very young children because they were rated as technically adequate across most criteria. The psychometric properties were strongest for most instruments at the middle (i.e., 3-6 to 4-6) and upper (i.e., 4-6 to 5-6) levels of the preschool age range. Because all intelligence tests have different strengths and limitations, the technical characteristics of these tests should be considered carefully before one selects an instrument for use with preschoolers. Future research should examine the role of intelligence within a framework of developing abilities in young children, so that its relevance in early educational interventions, as well as diagnosis and classification of preschoolers, can be realized.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 13, No. 1, 66-90 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299501300105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Krasa Is the Woodcock-Johnson III a Test for All Seasons? Ceiling and Item Gradient Considerations in Its Use With Older Students Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, March 1, 2007; 25(1): 3 - 16. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Gordon Test Review: Wechsler, D. (2002). The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Third Edition (WPPSI-III). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation Canadian Journal of School Psychology, January 1, 2004; 19(1-2): 205 - 220. [PDF]

				R. R. Fewell and C. A. Wheeden A Pilot Study of Intervention with Adolescent Mothers and their Children: A Preliminary Examination of Child Outcomes Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 1998; 18(1): 18 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. A. Riccio, C. M. Ross, C. H. Boan, S. Jemison, and F. Houston Use of the Differential Ability Scales (DAS) Special Nonverbal Composite among Young Children with Linguistic Differences Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1997; 15(3): 196 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. L. Kaplan and V. C. Alfonso Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition with Preschoolers with Developmental Delays Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1997; 15(3): 226 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF]