Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keith, T. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Using Multi-Sample Confirmatory Factor Analysis to Test for Construct Bias: An Example Using the K-ABC

Timothy Z. Keith

Division of School Psychology, Alfred University, 26 North Main Street, Alfred, NY 14802

Mark H. Fugate

Michelle DeGraff

Christine M. Diamond

E. Andrea Shadrach

Michelle L. Stevens

Recent research designed to investigate construct bias in the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children served the additional purpose of illustrating several useful methods for detecting construct bias. The purpose of this reanalysis was to illustrate a new, powerful method for testing the similarity of the constructs measured across groups (and, thus, detecting construct bias): multi-sample confirmatory factor analysis (MCFA). Our reanalysis suggested that the K-ABC measures indistinguishable abilities for Black and White children at ages 7 through 8. Those analyses also showed differences in the attributes measured for Black and White children for ages 9 through 12. Follow-up demonstrated that the differences among that latter group were due to trivial aspects of measurement rather than critical differences in the constructs measured by the test across groups. We argue that MCFA provides a more organized, direct, objective, and complete method for detecting construct bias than do other methods.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 13, No. 4, 347-364 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299501300402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
R. B. Kline
Software Review: Software Programs for Structural Equation Modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, December 1, 1998; 16(4): 343 - 364.
[PDF]