Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Zubicaray, G.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparison of IQs and Verbal-Performance IQ Discrepancies Estimated from Two Seven-Subtest Short Forms of the WAIS-R

Greig de Zubicaray

Centre for Magnetic Resonance, University of Queensland, Australia

Glen Smith

University of Queensland, Australia

Deborah Anderson

Royal Brisbane Hospital, Queensland, Australia

The present study compared IQs and Verbal-Performance IQ discrepancies estimated from two seven-subtest short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) in a sample of 100 subjects referred for neuropsychological assessment. The short forms of Warrington, James, and Maciejewski (1986) and Ward (1990) yielded similar correlation coefficients and absolute error rates with respect to WAIS-R IQs, although the Warrington short form requires more time to administer and score. Both short forms were able to detect significant Verbal-Performance IQ discrepancies 70% of the time. However, they incorrectly yielded significant discrepancies for approximately 25% of the sample who did not have significant differences on the full WAIS-R. The results do not support reporting and interpreting significant Verbal-Performance IQ discrepancies estimated from these short forms.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 14, No. 2, 121-130 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299601400203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
J. J. Ryan
Two Types of Tables for Use with the Seven-Subtest Short Form of the WAIS-R
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, December 1, 1997; 15(4): 308 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
J. J. Ryan, M. E. Weilage, S. J. Lopez, A. M. Paolo, D. M. Miller, and J. Morris
Application of the Seven-Subtest Short Form of the WAIS-R in African Americans with Brain Damage
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, December 1, 1997; 15(4): 314 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]