This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by German, D. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Effect of Word-Finding Difficulties on Intellectual Assessment

National-Louis University

Professionals believe that students' language and learning challenges frequently complicate interpretation of their intelligence test scores. One specific language difficulty that has the potential to affect students' cognitive test performance is difficulty in word finding. This investigation examined the influence of students' word-finding difficulties on their test performance on the WISC-R. Eighty-one fourth- and fifth-grade students with learning disabilities with WISC-R subscale scores on file were administered the Test of Word Finding (TWF). Classification of the LD sample by word-finding skills formed the basis for group comparisons. Initial analysis of variance using composite IQs as the unit of analysis indicated that students with word-finding difficulties earned significantly lower mean WISCR Verbal IQs than did students without word-finding difficulties, whereas mean differences in the Performance Scale IQs did not differ significantly. An initial multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), treating the 10 WISC-R subtests as the dependent variable set, was also statistically significant (p< .05). Univariate F tests and eta-squared values were used as post hoc indicators of variable importance to differentiate between students with and without word-finding difficulties in the LD population. Significant differences in word-finding group means emerged on the Information, Similarities ("large" effect range), and Comprehension subtests ("medium" effect range). Neither Vocabulary, Arithmetic, nor Performance subscale mean differences were statistically significant. A "retrieval deficit hypothesis" is presented as an explanation for the Verbal subtest score differences, suggesting that students' performance on these subtests appears influenced by students' word-finding difficulties. A Word-Finding adapted-assessment approach is presented as a practical solution to this assessment dilemma.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 14, No. 4, 373-384 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299601400405


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?