Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Alfonso, V. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition with Preschoolers with Developmental Delays

Stephen L. Kaplan

Developmental Disabilities Institute

Vincent C. Alfonso

Fordham University, Graduate School of Education and Crossroads School for Child Development

The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition (Binet IV; Thorndike, Hagen, & Sattler, 1986) has allowed for the evaluation of cognitive abilities across the life span and has been used frequently to assess the cognitive functioning of young children (e.g., 2-year-olds). Traditionally, four cognitive factors are interpreted along with an overall composite score. This study presents results of confirmatory factor analyses of the Binet IV, administered to 441 children between the ages of 2 and 5 years who have developmental delays. Four competing models were tested using iterative, maximum likelihood estimation of parameters. Results are consistent with previous factor analytic studies in that the traditional four-factor model is inferior to a two-factor or three-factor model. Implications for interpretation of Binet IV scores with young children with developmental delays are discussed.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 15, No. 3, 226-236 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299701500304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?