Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacMillan, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bocian, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Curing Mental Retardation and Causing Learning Disabilities: Consequences of Using Various WISC-III IQs to Estimate Aptitude of Hispanic Students

Donald L. MacMillan

Research Programs for Students At-Risk University of California at Riverside

Frank M. Gresham

Research Programs for Students At-Risk University of California at Riverside

Kathleen M. Bocian

Research Programs for Students At-Risk University of California at Riverside

An ethnically stratified sample of 150 children referred to school study teams (SSTs) were administered the WISC-III and WRAT-R and assigned by research criteria reflecting the State of California criteria as having mental retardation, a learning disability, or neither disability (ineligible). When the WISC-III IQs were compared, the Hispanic subjects in the referred sample achieved PIQs that were on average 8 points higher than VIQ a difference not found for White or Black groups. Use of PIQ rather than FSIQ resulted in a dramatic reduction in the number of Hispanic students qualifying as children with mental retardation; however, use of PIQ also markedly increased the number of Hispanic students qualifying as children with a "severe discrepancy" as learning disabled. The actual school decisions reached on these children were contrasted to research criteria, revealing rather limited congruence with classifications based on either FSIQ or PIQ. Finally, multivariate analyses revealed significant differences between "stable" (qualifying under both FSIQ and PIQ) cases of mental retardation, learning disabilities, and ineligible on achievement and deportment.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 16, No. 1, 36-54 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299801600103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
E. J. Sabornie, C. Evans, and D. Cullinan
Comparing Characteristics of High-Incidence Disability Groups: A Descriptive Review
Remedial and Special Education, April 1, 2006; 27(2): 95 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]