Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LoBello, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Evani, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Supplementary WAIS-III Tables for Determining Subtest Strengths and Weaknesses

Steven G. LoBello

Auburn University Montgomery

Anthony P. Thompson

Charles Sturt University

Venugopala Evani

Auburn University Montgomery

Analysis of relative subtest strengths and weaknesses is a familiar procedure used in the interpretation of Wechsler Scale data. The WAIS-II test manual provides some tables to facilitate this process but does not include a table for subtest analysis when six Performance Scale subtests are administered. Six Performance Scale subtests must be administered if examiners are to obtain both the Performance IQ and the Processing Speed index score. In addition, the WAIS-I1I manual does not include tables for use when certain optional subtests are substituted for subtests that are spoiled during test administration. Three tables are provided in this article for such circumstances. They may be used for determining both the significance and infrequency of differences between individual subtest scaled scores and the mean Verbal or Performance subtest score.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 16, No. 3, 196-200 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299801600301
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?