Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, N. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lambert, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Reliability and Validity of a Short Form of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems

Nathan B. Hansen

Brigham Young University

Val Umphress

American School of Professional Psychology-Hawaii

Michael J. Lambert

Brigham Young University

The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) is a 127-item measure designed to assess problems of an interpersonal nature in a clinical setting. As an outcome measure, however, its clinical use is limited due to its length and current trends in therapy research toward multiple, rather than merely pre- and post-, assessments. A shortened form of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IP-S) is proposed to remedy this limitation and to encourage repeated testing over time. This article examines the psychometric properties of the IIP-S as well as its potential as an outcome instrument. High reliability and validity coefficients were found, and the IIP-S was able to distinguish between asymptomatic, community, and outpatient samples. Application of the IIP-S to dose-response research, clinical significance, and the phase model of psychotherapy out-come are also discussed.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 16, No. 3, 201-214 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299801600302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?