Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wodrich, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kush, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT): Concurrent Validity of Fluid Ability for Preadolescents and Adolescents with Central Nervous System Disorders and Scholastic Concerns

David L. Wodrich

Illinois State University

Joseph C. Kush

Duquesne University

Fifty preadolescents and adolescents (33 with scholastic concerns and 17 with central nervous system disorders) were assessed with a battery that included the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III), the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT) Fluid subtests, and individually administered achievement tests. The KAIT Fluid IQ (FIQ) demonstrated acceptable concurrent validity with WISC-III IQ and with various achievement subtests, although an anticipated stronger association with Performance IQ than with Verbal IQ did not occur. Among subjects with scholastic concerns, KAIT FIQ was higher than WISC-III Full Scale IQ (100.6 vs. 90.3), and when KAIT FIQ was used as a predictor of achievement, more students with severe IQ/achievement discrepancies were identified (KAIT = 58%; WISC-III = 30%). Subjects with CNS disorders scored more poorly than their counterparts with scholastic concerns on the KAIT Fluid subtests but not on the WISC-III.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 16, No. 3, 215-225 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299801600303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?