Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Horn, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Snyder, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Family Resource Scale-Revised: Psychometrics and Validation of a Measure of Family Resources in a Sample of Low-Income Families

M. Lee Van Horn

The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Jeffrey M. Bellis

The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Scott W. Snyder

The University of Alabama at Birmingham

In studying child and family outcomes it is often critical to assess families' general availability of resources. Traditionally, many researchers have used income and SES to assess family resources. This study examined an alternative measure in a national sample of low-income families. Hypothesizing that Dunst and Leet's (1987) Family Resource Scale (FRS) assesses specific aspects of perceived family resources, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. Analyses supported a four-factor structure: Basic Needs, Money, Time for Self, and Time for Family. External validity was assessed by examining the relationship of subscale scores to other measures of family resources. Predictive validity was examined by evaluating the relationship with child cognitive and social outcomes. Subscales were found to fit the data consistently, to be moderately related to other measures of family resources, and to predict a meaningful amount of variance in child outcomes above and beyond family income, parent education, and parent work status.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 19, No. 1, 54-68 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/073428290101900104
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 The Family JournalHome page
L. M. Hooper, J. J. Burnham, and R. Richey
Select Parent and Family System Correlates of Adolescent Current Weight Status: A Pilot Study
The Family Journal, January 1, 2009; 17(1): 14 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Early InterventionHome page
L. H. Bolzani Dinehart, J. L. Dice, D. R. Dobbins, A. H. Claussen, and K. E. Bono
Proximal Variables in Families of Children Prenatally Exposed to Cocaine and Enrolled in a Center- or Home-Based Intervention
Journal of Early Intervention, October 1, 2006; 29(1): 32 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]