Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Free Access - Register Here

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 19, No. 3, 245-267 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/073428290101900305

Time for the Changing of the Guard: A Farewell to Short Forms of Intelligence Tests

James C. Kaufman

Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey, jkaufman{at}ets.org

Alan S. Kaufman

Yale University School of Medicine

The development of short forms of intelligence tests, especially of Wechsler's scales, has been a pastime of researchers and clinicians for decades. These short forms have usually been of the two- or four-subtest variety, but other variants such as Satz-Mogel split-half short forms have also been common. The literature is replete with proposed short forms and with controversies over their proper use, the statistical problems associated with validity coefficients when the short-form data are obtained from a complete administration of the test battery, and the logic of choosing subtests that are long to administer and score in view of the goal to reduce time. This article argues that the time has come to abandon short forms of intelligence tests in favor of brief tests such as the K-BIT, WASI, and WRIT, which are reliable, valid, well normed, and easy both to give and score.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian Journal of School PsychologyHome page
W. C. Scott, D. W. Austin, and D. S. Reid
Investigation of the WISC-III and WASI in Clinical Child Populations: A Framework for Further Exploration
Canadian Journal of School Psychology, December 1, 2007; 22(2): 249 - 254.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
J. Shields, T. R. Konold, and J. J. Glutting
Validity of the Wide Range Intelligence Test: Differential Effects across Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Education Level
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, December 1, 2004; 22(4): 287 - 303.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
W.-C. C. Tam
The Utility of Seven-Subtest Short Forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III in Young Adults
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, March 1, 2004; 22(1): 62 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
R. M. Thorndike
Book Review: Handbook of psychoeducational assessment: Ability, achievement, and behavior in children
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, March 1, 2002; 20(1): 83 - 89.
[PDF]