Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bradley-Johnson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Construct Stability of the Cognitive Abilities Scale-Second Edition for Infants and Toddlers

C. Merle Johnson

Central Michigan University, johns1cm{at}mail.cmich.edu

Sharon Bradley-Johnson

Central Michigan University

The construct stability of the Infant Form of the Cognitive Abilities Scale-Second Edition (CAS-2) was examined with 54 children who were assessed when they were between 3 and 23 months old. They were assessed again with the Preschool Form of CAS-2 when they were 2- or 3-year-olds. The two forms have no overlapping items and employ different formats. The correlation for children assessed initially when less than 1 year of age was .28 (.46 corrected for restricted range). For those assessed initially at 12 to 23 months, a correlation of .65 (.76 corrected) was obtained. Results for the majority of individuals remained stable over time. Implications for practice and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 20, No. 2, 144-151 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/073428290202000203


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?