Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradley-Johnson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Durmusoglu, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Evaluation of Floors and Item Gradients for Reading and Math Tests for Young Children

Sharon Bradley-Johnson

Central Michigan University

Gokce Durmusoglu

Central Michigan University

Ignoring the adequacy of floors and item gradients for tests used with young children can have serious consequences. Thus, because of the importance of early intervention for reading and math problems, we used the criteria suggested by Bracken for adequate floors and item gradients, and reviewed 15 reading tests and 12 math tests for ages 4-0 through 7-11. Results indicate that few of these tests have adequate floors at the age at which their norms begin. Although most of the reading tests have adequate item gradients, only 4 of the 12 math tests did not have item gradient problems. If test floors and item gradients are not considered, examiners risk misdiagnosing young children and drawing invalid conclusions for research and program evaluation, especially for low-performing children.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 23, No. 3, 262-278 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/073428290502300305


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
N. Krasa
Is the Woodcock-Johnson III a Test for All Seasons? Ceiling and Item Gradient Considerations in Its Use With Older Students
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, March 1, 2007; 25(1): 3 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]