Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Making Sense of Multiple Informants in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

A Guide for Clinicians

Steven R. Smith

University of California, Santa Barbara, ssmith{at}education.ucsb.edu

Behavior ratings and self-report measures of child and adolescent psychopathology are often used to explore the types and extent of psychological disorders in youth. Yet a review of the literature suggests that parent, teacher, and self-report of psychopathology are not generally highly correlated. Moreover, even among the same type of rater (e.g., parents), there is often very little concordance in ratings. Although there is a substantial literature related to the circumstances under which different informants can be expected to correlate, there is little to guide psychologists in clinical decision making. The present article briefly reviews issues related to both rater and child characteristics that affect the quality and utility of their ratings. The child characteristics of age, setting, and type of problem and the relationship of these to rating quality are highlighted. Last, suggestions are made about which rater should be given the most weight and when.

Key Words: multimethod assessment • behavior ratings • rater agreement • assessment of children and adolescents

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 25, No. 2, 139-149 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0734282906296233
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?