This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smith, S. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Making Sense of Multiple Informants in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

A Guide for Clinicians

University of California, Santa Barbara, ssmith{at}education.ucsb.edu

Behavior ratings and self-report measures of child and adolescent psychopathology are often used to explore the types and extent of psychological disorders in youth. Yet a review of the literature suggests that parent, teacher, and self-report of psychopathology are not generally highly correlated. Moreover, even among the same type of rater (e.g., parents), there is often very little concordance in ratings. Although there is a substantial literature related to the circumstances under which different informants can be expected to correlate, there is little to guide psychologists in clinical decision making. The present article briefly reviews issues related to both rater and child characteristics that affect the quality and utility of their ratings. The child characteristics of age, setting, and type of problem and the relationship of these to rating quality are highlighted. Last, suggestions are made about which rater should be given the most weight and when.

Key Words: multimethod assessment • behavior ratings • rater agreement • assessment of children and adolescents

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 25, No. 2, 139-149 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0734282906296233


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?