Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparison of WAIS and WAIS-R IQs from Two Equivalent College Populations

Marjorie L. Lewis

Illinois State University

James J. Johnson

Illinois State University

The present investigation compared the WAIS (N = 39) and WAIS-R (N = 35) IQs of two groups of college undergraduates (aged 17 to 22) judged to be comparable in aptitude as measured by ACT scores. The WAIS-R IQs were found to be significantly lower than the WAIS IQs and approximate those reported by Wechsler for a group aged 35 to 44. The WAIS/WAIS-R differences have important implications in the use of these tests in school and clinical settings. Correlations of the WAIS and the WAIS-R IQs with the Composite and the subscale scores of the ACT indicate that the WAIS-R IQs are more congruent with ACT test results than WAIS IQs.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 3, No. 1, 55-60 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/073428298500300106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?