Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effectiveness of the Ppvt-r in tHe Screening of Young Gifted Children

Frusanna B. Hayes

University of Georgia

Roy P. Martin

University of Georgia

The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Form L-M, and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R), Form M, were administered to 100 preschool, kindergarten, and first grade children (ages 3 years, 10 months to 6 years, 11 months). The sample contained a high proportion of children who were perceived by parents as being above average or intellectually gifted. The mean PPVT-R standard score for this referral sample was 111.43 (SD = 13.86) and the mean Stanford-Binet IQ score was 123.72 (SD = 16.79). Analysis of the results indicated a correlation between the instruments of .58, and the mean scores were significantly different on the two measures (p < .0001). Examination of the data revealed that differences were greater for children at the upper IQ ranges (120 +) than at the lower ranges. Based on the results of this study, it appears that the efficacy of the PPVT-R as a screening instrument for the identification of young gifted children is questionable if conventional intelligence measures such as the Stanford-Binet are to be used as a diagnostic criterion.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 4, No. 1, 27-33 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/073428298600400103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?