Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Munn, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Battelle Developmental Inventory: Teacher Perceptions and Implementation Data

Donald B. Bailey, Jr.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Pat Vandiviere

North Carolina Department of Human Resources

Janice Dellinger

North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Duncan Munn

North Carolina Department of Human Resources

This article reports results from a statewide implementation study of the Battelle Developmental Inventory. A total of 76 teachers participated by assessing 247 handicapped preschoolers. Data are presented with regard to perceived usefulness of the BDI, administration and scoring time, scoring accuracy, usefulness of adaptations, and calculation of extreme scores. Teachers were moderately positive about the various possible uses of the measure, although ratings for use with severely handicapped children were much lower than those for mild and moderately handicapped youngsters. Teachers made a large number of errors in administering and scoring the instrument. Approximately half of the adaptations for handicapped children were rated as appropriate. Implications of these and other findings for use of the BDI in early intervention programs are discussed.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 5, No. 3, 217-226 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/073428298700500304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?