Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naglieri, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Das, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Construct and Criterion-Related Validity of Planning, Simultaneous, and Successive Cognitive Processing Tasks

Jack A. Naglieri

Ohio State University

J. P. Das

University of Alberta

This paper presents evidence for the construct and criterion-related validity of the Planning - Simultaneous - Successive model of information-integration presented by Das, Kirby, and Jarman (1975) and provides support for tasks designed to operationalize the model. A sample of 434 students in grades 2, 6, and 10 were administered cognitive processing and achievement tests. Significant developmental changes in scores across the three grades and significant correlations with achievement in reading and math provided support for the validity of these cognitive processing tasks. Simultaneous and planning appeared to be more related to math than successive processes at the younger ages, and reading correlated with coding at the lower ages and both coding and planning at tenth grade. Planning and coding correlated significantly with achievement (rs = .23, .45, .56 and .37, .33, .52 for grades 2, 6, and 10 for planning and coding, respectively). Planning was related increasingly to the total MAST, as well as separate reading and math scores, with age. Implications for the assessment of intellectual functioning are presented.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 5, No. 4, 353-363 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/073428298700500405
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?