Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cowart, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by McCallum, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Multi-Trait-Multi-Method Investigation of the Simultaneous-Successive-Planning Model

Charles A. Cowart

Ellisville State School, Ellisville, Mississippi

R. Steve McCallum

University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Constructs that comprise the Simultaneous-Successive-Planning model were assessed to determine their convergent and discriminate validity by use of a Multi-Trait-Multi-Method (MTMM) procedure. Participants, 120 college students, responded to a battery of tests purported to measure the constructs of Simultaneous and Successive processing and of Planning. Results from the MTMM matrix failed to confirm predictions from the model; obtained coefficients ranged from .01 to .35. The constructs do not appear robust relative to other sources of variance, especially method variance. Consequently, the advisability of implementing narrow, non-method-oriented model-based treatement interventions appears questionable.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 6, No. 1, 55-66 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/073428298800600106
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
C. A. Cowart and R. S. McCallum
Testing Luria's Model: A Reply to Naglieri and Das
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, June 1, 1990; 8(2): 172 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
B. A. Rothlisberg
Processing Styles, Reading Performance and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, December 1, 1989; 7(4): 304 - 311.
[Abstract] [PDF]