Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spruill, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Two Types of Tables for Use with the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition

Jean Spruill

University of Alabama

Confidence intervals for the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition were computed for the Verbal Reasoning SAS, the Quantitative Reasoning SAS, the Abstract/Visual Reasoning SAS, the Short-Term Memory SAS, and the Composite SAS. These intervals were computed separately for each age group using the 90% and 95%7o levels of confidence. The differences required for significance among the Area SASs and between the Area SAS and Composite SAS were computed for the .05 and .10 levels of significance. In addition, the differences necessary to determine that subtest scaled scores are significantly different from the mean of the respective areas were calculated for the .05 and .10 level. The Bonferroni t inequality was used to control for multiple comparisons. All values were computed using the standard errors of measurement for the standardization sample reported in the Technical manual. The use of the tables in interpreting test scores is discussed.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 6, No. 1, 78-86 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/073428298800600108


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?