This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Naglieri, J. A. Articles by Das, J. P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, and Successive (PASS) Cognitive Processes as a Model for Intelligence

Ohio State University

J. P. Das

University of Alberta

This paper proposes an alternative theory of cognitive processing to serve as a model for reconceptualizing intelligence and facilitate evolution in this important area. The Planning, Attention, Simultaneous, and Successive (PASS) model, based on the work of A. R. Luria, is suggested as a broad conceptualization and framework for cognitive processing. Luria's view of these processes is presented in detail, as are experimental tasks developed by Das and Naglieri to measure these processes. An analysis of the WISC-R and K-ABC from the PASS model is provided to gain some understanding of what current tests measure. Factor analytic, criterion related and discriminant validation of the PASS model is presented, as are the current experimental tasks used in the Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System. Finally, responses to some of the conference reviewers' comments are provided.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 8, No. 3, 303-337 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299000800308


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Naglieri and S. H. Gottling Mathematics Instruction and PASS Cognitive Processes: An Intervention Study J Learn Disabil, September 1, 1997; 30(5): 513 - 520. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Kirby, C. A. Booth, and J. P. Das COGNITIVE PROCESSES AND IQ IN READING DISABILITY Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1996; 29(4): 442 - 456. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Naglieri and S. M. Reardon Traditional IQ Is Irrelevant to Learning Disabilities--Intelligence Is Not J Learn Disabil, February 1, 1993; 26(2): 127 - 133. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. F. Telzrow Does PASS Pass the Test? A Critique of the Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1990; 8(3): 344 - 355. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. W. Kamphaus K-ABC Theory in Historical and Current Contexts Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1990; 8(3): 356 - 368. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. C. Conoley Review of the K-ABC: Reflecting the Unobservable Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1990; 8(3): 369 - 375. [Abstract] [PDF]