|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Review of the K-ABC: Reflecting the Unobservable
Jane Close Conoley
Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
In response to Dr. Randy Kamphaus' paper on the theoretical origins of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (Kaufman & Kaufman, 1983), an argument is made that relates to the lack of factor analytic support for the independence of simultaneous and sequential mental processing, the tenuous claim that the K-ABC's mental processing and achievement scales are measuring different constructs, and that meaningful measures of intelligence can be considered as content free.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 8, No. 3,
369-375 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299000800312

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Lidza and S. L. Macrineb
An Alternative Approach to the Identification of Gifted Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Learners: The Contribution of Dynamic Assessment
School Psychology International,
February 1, 2001;
22(1):
74 - 96.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Canter
Book Review: Understanding children's testing: Psychological testing
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
March 1, 1993;
11(1):
89 - 91.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Buckhalt
Book Review: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised (WPPSI-R)
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
September 1, 1991;
9(3):
271 - 279.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. W. Kamphaus
K-ABC Theory in Historical and Current Contexts
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
September 1, 1990;
8(3):
356 - 368.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|