Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0734282906298264v1
25/4/319    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koonce, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Assessment Practices by Practicing School Psychologists: A National Survey

Danel A. Koonce*

Valley View Public Schools, Kingston, Rhode Island

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: koonced{at}vvsd.org.


  Abstract
The purpose of the current study is to examine school psychologists’ assessment practices of children presenting with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptomology using a case vignette. A random sample of 500 members of the National Association of School Psychologists is sent surveys; 246 are included in the study (49%). Results indicate some regional differences in the use of instruments and procedures selected by the respondents based on the case vignette. The most commonly selected assessment instruments and procedures are reflective of an approach consistent with a best practice, ongoing problem-solving process. Limitations of current practices are discussed.

First published on July 12, 2007, doi:10.1177/0734282906298264

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 2007;25:319.

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2007

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
T. J. Christ, T. C. Riley-Tillman, and S. M. Chafouleas
Foundation for the Development and Use of Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) to Assess and Evaluate Student Behavior
Assessment for Effective Intervention, September 1, 2009; 34(4): 201 - 213.
[Abstract] [PDF]