|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the WPPSI-R
James S. Gyurke
The Psychological Corporation
Brian J. Stone
The Psychological Corporation
Marie Beyer
The Psychological Corporation
The purpose of this study was to determine the underlying factor structure of the WPPSI-R. Previous factor analyses of the WPPSI generally have supported a two-factor interpretation. Three separate maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analyses were performed on the WPPSI-R standardization sample (N = 1,700). A one-factor (general), a two-factor (verbal and performance), and a three-factor solution were imposed on the median intercorrelation matrix of the 12 WPPSI-R subtests. A comparison of underlying theory and goodness-of-fit statistics for the three analyses provided support for the two-factor solution as best representing the underlying structure of the WPPSI-R. The verbal and performance factors correlated highly, which indicates an underlying general component. The results lend continued support for the interpretation of separate Verbal and Performance Scales and for the interpretation of a Full Scale Score.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 8, No. 1,
15-21 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299000800103

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Guo, P. Aveyard, and X. Dai
The Chinese Intelligence Scale for Young Children: Testing Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Using the Framework of the Wechsler Intelligence Tests
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
June 1, 2009;
69(3):
459 - 474.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Laughlin
The School Readiness Composite of the Bracken Basic Concept Scale as an Intellectual Screening Instrument
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
September 1, 1995;
13(3):
294 - 302.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Riccio, L. O. Platt, R. W. Kamphaus, M. K. Greer, and N. Elksnin
Principal Components Analysis of the General Purpose Abbreviated Battery of the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition, for Young Children
Assessment,
June 1, 1994;
1(2):
173 - 178.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. M. Macmann and D. W. Barnett
Redefining the Wisc-R: Implications for Professional Practice and Public Policy
Journal of Special Education,
January 1, 1992;
26(2):
139 - 161.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. W. Barnett, G. M. Macmann, and K. T. Carey
Early Intervention and the Assessment of Developmental Skills: Challenges and Directions
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
January 1, 1992;
12(1):
1 - 20.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. H. Schneider and M. D. Gervais
Identifying Gifted Kindergarten Students with Brief Screening Measures and the WPPSI-R
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
September 1, 1991;
9(3):
201 - 208.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. H. Roid and J. Gyurke
General-Factor and Specific Variance in the WPPSI-R
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
September 1, 1991;
9(3):
209 - 223.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Milrod and L. Rescorla
A Comparison of the WPPSI-R and WPPSI with HIGH-IQ Children
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
September 1, 1991;
9(3):
255 - 262.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. J. Stone, B. E. Gridley, and J. S. Gyurke
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the WPPSI-R at the Extreme End of the Age Range
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
September 1, 1991;
9(3):
263 - 270.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Buckhalt
Book Review: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised (WPPSI-R)
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
September 1, 1991;
9(3):
271 - 279.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Delugach
Book Review: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised (WPPSI-R)
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
September 1, 1991;
9(3):
280 - 290.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Zachary
Wechsler's Intelligence Scales: Theoretical and Practical Considerations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment,
September 1, 1990;
8(3):
276 - 289.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|