Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for FREE ACCESS to this landmark database

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gyurke, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Beyer, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the WPPSI-R

James S. Gyurke

The Psychological Corporation

Brian J. Stone

The Psychological Corporation

Marie Beyer

The Psychological Corporation

The purpose of this study was to determine the underlying factor structure of the WPPSI-R. Previous factor analyses of the WPPSI generally have supported a two-factor interpretation. Three separate maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analyses were performed on the WPPSI-R standardization sample (N = 1,700). A one-factor (general), a two-factor (verbal and performance), and a three-factor solution were imposed on the median intercorrelation matrix of the 12 WPPSI-R subtests. A comparison of underlying theory and goodness-of-fit statistics for the three analyses provided support for the two-factor solution as best representing the underlying structure of the WPPSI-R. The verbal and performance factors correlated highly, which indicates an underlying general component. The results lend continued support for the interpretation of separate Verbal and Performance Scales and for the interpretation of a Full Scale Score.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 8, No. 1, 15-21 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299000800103


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Educational and Psychological MeasurementHome page
B. Guo, P. Aveyard, and X. Dai
The Chinese Intelligence Scale for Young Children: Testing Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Using the Framework of the Wechsler Intelligence Tests
Educational and Psychological Measurement, June 1, 2009; 69(3): 459 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
T. Laughlin
The School Readiness Composite of the Bracken Basic Concept Scale as an Intellectual Screening Instrument
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1995; 13(3): 294 - 302.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
C. A. Riccio, L. O. Platt, R. W. Kamphaus, M. K. Greer, and N. Elksnin
Principal Components Analysis of the General Purpose Abbreviated Battery of the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition, for Young Children
Assessment, June 1, 1994; 1(2): 173 - 178.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
G. M. Macmann and D. W. Barnett
Redefining the Wisc-R: Implications for Professional Practice and Public Policy
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1992; 26(2): 139 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
D. W. Barnett, G. M. Macmann, and K. T. Carey
Early Intervention and the Assessment of Developmental Skills: Challenges and Directions
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, January 1, 1992; 12(1): 1 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
B. H. Schneider and M. D. Gervais
Identifying Gifted Kindergarten Students with Brief Screening Measures and the WPPSI-R
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1991; 9(3): 201 - 208.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
G. H. Roid and J. Gyurke
General-Factor and Specific Variance in the WPPSI-R
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1991; 9(3): 209 - 223.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
R. J. Milrod and L. Rescorla
A Comparison of the WPPSI-R and WPPSI with HIGH-IQ Children
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1991; 9(3): 255 - 262.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
B. J. Stone, B. E. Gridley, and J. S. Gyurke
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the WPPSI-R at the Extreme End of the Age Range
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1991; 9(3): 263 - 270.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
J. A. Buckhalt
Book Review: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised (WPPSI-R)
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1991; 9(3): 271 - 279.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
R. R. Delugach
Book Review: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised (WPPSI-R)
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1991; 9(3): 280 - 290.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
R. A. Zachary
Wechsler's Intelligence Scales: Theoretical and Practical Considerations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1990; 8(3): 276 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]