Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3e

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDermott, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Glutting, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Just Say No to Subtest Analysis: A Critique on Wechsler Theory and Practice

Paul A. McDermott

University of Pennsylvania

John W. Fantuzzo

University of Pennsylvania

Joseph J. Glutting

University of Delaware

Wechsler's beliefs about the nature of human intelligence and its measurement have profoundly influenced contemporary theory and practice. He encouraged interpretations not only of more global intellective indices, such as IQ but encouraged as well the search for pathognomonic meaning in patterns of underlying, more specific, subtest scores. This article examines the evidence that concerns the interpretation of Wechsler and similar tests as measures of specific rather than global ability. Popular practices that involve use of subtests for both intraindividual and interindividual assessment are viewed in the light of empirical research, and recommendations are presented.

Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, Vol. 8, No. 3, 290-302 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/073428299000800307


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
J. J. Glutting, M. W. Watkins, T. R. Konold, and P. A. McDermott
Distinctions Without a Difference: The Utility of Observed Versus Latent Factors From the WISC-IV in Estimating Reading and Math Achievement on the WIAT-II
Journal of Special Education, August 1, 2006; 40(2): 103 - 114.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
H.-J. Oh, J. J. Glutting, M. W. Watkins, E. A. Youngstrom, and P. A. McDermott
Correct Interpretation of Latent Versus Observed Abilities: Implications From Structural Equation Modeling Applied to the WISC-III and WIAT Linking Sample
Journal of Special Education, November 1, 2004; 38(3): 159 - 173.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AssessmentHome page
P. van der Heijden and J. Donders
WAIS-III Factor Index Score Patterns After Traumatic Brain Injury
Assessment, June 1, 2003; 10(2): 115 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
M. W. Watkins, J. C. Kush, and B. A. Schaefer
Diagnostic Utility of the Learning Disability Index
J Learn Disabil, March 1, 2002; 35(2): 98 - 103.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
J. T. Davis, G. Parr, and W. Lan
Differences Between Learning Disability Subtypes Classified Using the Revised Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery
J Learn Disabil, May 1, 1997; 30(3): 346 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
T. R. Konold, J. J. Glutting, and P. A. McDermott
THE DEVELOPMENT AND APPLIED UTILITY OF A NORMATIVE APTITUDE-ACHIEVEMENT TAXONOMY FOR THE WOODCOCK-JOHNSON PSYCHO-EDUCATIONAL BATTERY-REVISED
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1997; 31(2): 212 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
M. W. Watkins
Diagnostic Utility of the WISC-III Developmental Index as a Predictor of Learning Disabilities
J Learn Disabil, May 1, 1996; 29(3): 305 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
N. L. Kaufman and A. S. Kaufman
Book Review: GA TSB: Guide to the Assessment of Test Session Behavior for the WISC-III and the WIAT
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1995; 13(3): 318 - 325.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
J. J. Glutting, E. A. McGrath, R. W. Kamphaus, and P. A. McDermott
Taxonomy and Validity of Subtest Profiles on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1992; 26(1): 85 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
P. A. McDermott, J. W. Fantuzzo, J. J. Glutting, M. W. Watkins, and A. R. Baggaley
Illusions of Meaning in the Ipsative Assessment of Children's Ability
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1992; 25(4): 504 - 526.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
R. A. Zachary
Wechsler's Intelligence Scales: Theoretical and Practical Considerations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1990; 8(3): 276 - 289.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Psychoeducational AssessmentHome page
A. Canter
A New Binet, an Old Premise: A Mismatch between Technology and Evolving Practice
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, September 1, 1990; 8(3): 443 - 450.
[Abstract] [PDF]